|
Helicopter Crash | Accident
Investigation | Lawsuit
& Legal Info | NTSB
Crash Report |
 |
 |
 |
GET A FREE CASE EVALUATION
If
you or a loved one have been seriously injured in a helicopter crash then call
us for a Free Initial Consultation. Talk to a Board Certified Personal Injury
Trial Lawyer in Texas with over 20 years of personal injury and wrongful death
lawsuit experience. Know your rights under the law. Call to find out your rights
to a personal injury claim, wrongful death lawsuit or other legal action. Call
Now or E-mail us.
NO FEES OR EXPENSES CHARGED UNLESS WE RECOVERY FOR YOU !!
(Contact a
Lawyer Now)
Call
Toll Free
1-800-883-9858
BOARD
CERTIFIED
TRIAL LAWYER
If you have been injured,
Talk to a Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Lawyer, certified by the
Texas Board of Legal Specialization
since 1988. It cost you
nothing to discuss your case or ask a question to a Board Certified Personal
Injury Attorney in Texas. No Fees or Court Costs or Expenses charged to the
client unless we obtain a recovery. (Contact
A Board
Certified Trial Lawyer)
Call Toll Free
1-800-883-9858
COMMON QUESTIONS
What are the common causes of helicopter crash
accidents ? These include an inexperienced helicopter pilot, poorly trained
helicopter mechanics, negligent operation of the helicopter, poor weather
conditions, operating with excessive loads, negligent maintenance, excessive
hours on the turbine, engine, main rotor head, tail rotor, driveshaft, rotor
gear box, intermediate gear box, or tail rotor gear box, worn or overloaded
cam shaft & crankshaft, repeated over speed of engine resulting in valve
seat failure, failure of splines on the drive shaft and water contamination
in the fuel.

Other sources of helicopter accidents may be a helicopter owner's failure to properly address concerns in airworthiness directives, the helicopter pilots failure to place the craft into an autorotation, fuel exhaustion, failure to maintain control during autorotation, inadequate service bulletin warnings, improper use of the collective, inadequate communication / coordination between the flight crew and ground personnel, failure to properly react to a loss of engine power or in flight loss of power, failure to follow flight plan, loss of tail rotor control, loss of directional control, failure to maintain adequate main rotor rpm, flight engineer's inadequate visual lookout, improper use of the rotorcraft cyclic control and pilot's failure to obtain a preflight weather briefing.

In a helicopter crash lawsuit,
who are the defendants that are brought into a helicopter crash negligence & products
liability cases ? The best answer is, all responsible parties which can include
the helicopter owner, helicopter operator, charter service, contractor, helicopter
engine rebuilder, parts manufacturer, mechanics, and others that are determined
to caused or contributed to the helicopter crash. Litigation involving helicopter
crash injuries and deaths have include crashes of a weather helicopter, traffic
report helicopter, radio / television station helicopter, medical helicopter,
EMS helicopter, news helicopter, offshore helicopter charter service to oil
rig platforms and ships, tour helicopters for sightseeing, search & rescue
helicopter, ER helicopter, transport helicopter, and certain military helicopters.
|
|
 |
 |
|

|
 |
 |
home
| email |
 |
 |
 |

| WILLIS
LAW FIRM
1221 McKinney St.
One Houston Center
Suite # 3333
Houston,Tx 77010
TOLL FREE
1(800) 883-9858
1(800) 468-4878
|

 TALK TO
A LAWYER NOW
If
you or a family member have been seriously injured
or killed in a helicopter accident, then you need
to talk to an attorney as soon as possible in order
ro protect your legal rights regarding a personal
injury or wrongful death lawsuit, workers compensation
benefits & other legal actions An early investigation
of the helicopter crash is critical. Don't Delay
!
Talk to a Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Lawyer, certified by the Texas
Board of Legal Specialization since 1988. It cost you nothing to get a FREE
CASE EVALUATION or ask a question to a Board Certified Personal Injury
Attorney certified by The Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Call
Toll Free
24 hrs / Day
1 800 883 9858 |

© Copyright 2004
Helicopter Crashes
All Rights Reserved
*Notice/Disclosure
Disclaimer* |
|
|
TURBOMECA
HELICOPTER ENGINES
Turbomeca
manufacturers helicopter engines (turboshaft powerplants),
for both civil and military helicopters.Turbomeca currently produces two
helicopter type of engines. The engine families - Arrius and Arriel - for the
single or twin-engine light and medium helicopters. These engines power
a wide range of civil helicopters from Eurocopter (Ecureuil, Dauphin, EC135,
etc.), Agusta (A109 Power) and Sikorsky (S76), but also the Eurocopter Fennec
and Panther or Agusta A
109 Power military helicopters.
Turbomeca's
headquarters, main production site, R&D and sales, are located in the
foothills of the Pyrenees mountains at a town called Bordes, close to the
Spanish border in Southwest of France. TURBOMECA designs, manufactures and
develops propulsion gas turbines, gensets, cogeneration plants, Turbomecca
Makila engines and mechanical drives for industries, off-shore. Hundreds
of TURBOMECA turbines are in operation around the world. Turbomeca's principal
site for operator support is located in Tarnos, on the Atlantic coast in
Southwest of France. The company's repair center and training center are
also located in Tarnos. Turbomeca's others French locations are at Pau airport
where its subsidiary CGTM runs the company's flight test center, and in Toulouse
where the subsidiary Microturbo is located.
Apart from the French facilities, Turbomeca has developed a network of
nine subsidiaries abroad, dedicated to product support and product
promotion .
These subsidiaries are based in Dallas Texas, Rio de Janeiro Brazil,
Montevideo Uruguay, London UK, Hamburg Germany, Japan, Singapore, Sydney
Australia and South Africa .Unlike other engine manufacturers, Turbo meca
has the knowledge of engine / airframe integration, thanks to its CGTM
subsidiary
(Compagnie Générale des Turbomachines). CGTM is the flight test center
of Turbomeca, for the testing and adjustment of all Turbomeca engines.
Turbomeca do Brazil
Av. Ayrton Senna, 2541 - Hangar 10
Aeroporto de Jacarepagua
Rio de Janeiro - Rj
CEP 22775 - 001 - Brazil
Turbomeca Asia Pacific (TAP) lte Ltd.
63 Loyang Way Singapore 508753
Republic of Singapore
Turbomeca Australasia PTY Ltd (TAA)
Po box CP341, Condell Park NSW 2200
115, Wackett St, Bankstown Airport
Bankstown NSW2200 - Australia
Rolls-Royce
Turbomeca Ltd
4-5 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7DL
Tel: 020 72353641
LIFEFLIGHT
HELICOPTER CRASH- TURBOMECA HELICOPTER ENGINE BLAMED
NTSB Identification: CHI93FA182 .
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter
Accident occurred Thursday, May 27, 1993 in CAMERON, MO
Probable Cause Approval Date: 6/24/94
Aircraft: AEROSPATIALE AS-350B, registration: N782LF
Injuries: 2 Fatal, 2 Serious.
LIFEFLIGHT
HELICOPTER WAS EN ROUTE WITH PATIENT WHEN NURSE HEARD LOUD 'POP'
FOLLOWED BY 'CLATTERING' & HORN ALARM. SOON THEREAFTER, HELICOPTER IMPACTED
A FIELD ON SOUTHERLY HEADING ABOUT 70' SOUTH OF TALL TREES. GROUND SCARS &
DEBRIS WERE LOCATED ALONG 150' BY 80' PATH. WITNESSES SAID WIND WAS STRONG/GUSTY
FROM SOUTH. HELICOPTER WAS EQUIPPED WITH TURBOMECA ARRIEL 1B ENGINE WITH TU-76
MODIFICATION. IT HAD TOTAL FLIGHT TIME OF 2482 HOURS. RECOMMENDED TIME BETWEEN
OVERHAUL WAS 2500 HOURS. INVESTIGATION REVEALED ENGINE LOST POWER DUE TO FAILURE
OF LABYRINTH SEAL IN 2ND STAGE TURBINE NOZZLE GUIDE VANE. TUBOMECA PERSONNEL
PROPOSED THAT UNDER THERMAL LOW CYCLE FATIGUE, A CRACK COULD INITIATE ON 2ND
TURBINE NOZZLE GUIDE VANE HUB, WHICH COULD LEAD TO RUB BETWEEN INNER DIAMETER OF
HUB & INNER TURBINE LABYRINTH LIPS. THERE WERE 7 ENGINE FAILURES OF
SIMILAR NATURE, ALL RELATED TO TU-76 STANDARD NOZZLES. TURBOMECA SERVICE
BULLETIN 292 72 0153 WAS ISSUED TO IMPROVE MECHANICAL STRENGTH OF INTERNAL
ENVELOPE OF 2ND STAGE NOZZLE GUIDE VANE.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of
this accident as follows:
THE LOSS OF ENGINE POWER DUE TO FAILURE OF THE SECOND STAGE TURBINE LABYRINTH
SEAL. FACTORS RELATED TO THE ACCIDENT WERE: THE UNFAVORABLE WIND AND TALL
TREES BORDERING THE EMERGENCY LANDING AREA.
CHI93FA182
HISTORY OF THE FLIGHT
On May 27, 1993, at 0626 central daylight time, an Aerospatiale AS 350B
helicopter, N782LF, operated in emergency medical service by Rocky Mountain
Helicopters, Inc. (dba Life Flight), impacted terrain during an emergency
procedure in the vicinity of Cameron, Missouri. The LifeFlight helicopter was
destroyed. The ATP pilot and the patient were fatally injured. The flight
nurse (FN) and respiratory therapist (RT) received serious injuries. Visual
meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, no flight plan was filed.
The flight operated under 14 CFR Part 135, and originated from Harrison County
Hospital in Bethany, Missouri, approximately 0607. The intended destination
was St. Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri.
Records indicate the accident flight originated when two Life Flight company
helicopters launched from St. Luke's Hospital helipad on an "Air
Standby" status. The accident helicopter lifted off at 0424 and was
airborne when company dispatch personnel relayed the message that there would
be one patient in critical condition to pick up at the hospital in Bethany,
Missouri. The helicopter landed at Executive Beech Airport at 0428, took
on fuel, and departed the airport bound for Bethany, Missouri at 0442.
Flight following records indicate the pilot made a routine position report
with company dispatch at 0458. The pilot reported a heading of eighteen
degrees, 39 Nautical Miles (NM) to destination, a ground speed of 163 knots,
and 15 minutes estimated time en route. The dispatcher stated the pilot
commented it would be "slow going coming back" due to headwinds.
The helicopter arrived at Bethany at 0513. Upon arrival at Bethany, the FN
and RT entered the hospital to stabilize and prepare the patient for transport.
The FN estimated this process took about 40 to 50 minutes, during which time
the pilot remained with the helicopter. She stated after the patient was
loaded and secured in the helicopter, the pilot performed a "walk
around" inspection of the helicopter.
The helicopter departed Bethany approximately 0607. The FN reported the pilot
had alerted them to the headwinds, and told them to expect the return trip
to take longer. She stated the flight was smooth and uneventful until a couple
of
minutes after the pilot issued a position report at 0622. At that time she "...heard and could almost feel a loud "pop" and almost
immediately after a "clattering" sound coming from behind our
seats...we could hear the Horn alarm...and I noticed a bright white light
in the lower left area of the instrument panel."
The FN stated she saw the pilot "...working with the collective and
cyclic and the nose of the aircraft coming up...I remember a line of trees
that we were approaching...I remember feeling the sudden impact and then
feeling a large amount of dirt and debris fly into my face." The FN
estimated about 10 to 15 seconds elapsed between the "pop" and
ground impact. She did not recall any discussion during the emergency
procedure. The helicopter impacted terrain approximately 0626. Records
indicate the wreckage was discovered by local residents about 0715.
Although it was not possible to determine the exact altitude at which the
pilot conducted the accident flight, Life Flight personnel indicated they
typically operated about 1,000 feet above ground level (AGL), with occasional
variations based on weather, winds, obstacles, etc. One witness stated the
helicopter flew past her house "...in a southerly direction at low
altitude - 400 to 500 feet AGL... ." Witnesses and rescue personnel
stated the winds were strong (estimated at 25 to 30 knots) out of the south
the morning of the accident. Witness statements and the FN's statements are
appended to this report.

CREW INFORMATION
The pilot held of Airline Transport Pilot Certificate #2197255, with airplane
multi engine land privileges, commercial priveleges in airplane single engine
land and rotorcraft/helicopter, and an instrument-helicopter rating, issued
March 31, 1989. He held a Second Class medical certificate with no
limitations, issued March 2, 1993. Copies of these forms are appended.
The pilot's flight logbook was not located during the course of the
investigation. According to FAA records, the pilot had approximately 4,970
hours total flight time, including about 1,400 hours of military flight time.
Records also indicated the pilot had averaged about 100 to 120 flight hours
per year for the preceding three years. Life Flight records indicate the pilot
had flown 5.5 hours during the month of May, 1993, with the most recent flight
on May 25. Copies of FAA and Life Flight records are appended to this report.
Life Flight records indicate the pilot completed his most recent FAR Part 135
proficiency check on August 29, 1992, with the next check due in July, 1993.
The FAA Form 8410-3, FAR 135 Airman Competency/Proficiency Check, indicated
the flight check was accomplished in 0.8 hours, with all tested flight
maneuvers graded satisfactory ("S"). Under the title
"Helicopter", simulated engine failure, autorotations, and hover
rotations were marked "S". A copy of the proficiency check form is
appended to this report.
Life Flight's Aviation Manager reported the company did not perform practice
autorotations to touchdown. He stated they simulated autorotations with no
power reduction, and terminated in a hover at three feet above the ground.
They would then transition to a nearby area for hover autorotation practice.
He indicated the pilot had probably not performed an autorotation to actual
touchdown during the seven years he had been employed by Life Flight.
AIRCRAFT INFORMATION
A review of maintenance records revealed the helicopter was maintained in
accordance with Federal Regulations and manufacturer's guidelines.
COMMUNICATIONS
Company dispatch personnel provide "flight following" services for
Life Flight operations. Company procedure calls for pilots to transmit
departure and arrival reports, as well as position reports every 15 minutes.
At 0458, the pilot radioed a position report to dispatch personnel which
included an en route ground speed of 163 knots. He commented it would be
"...slow going coming back." The pilot transmitted a position report
at 0513, indicating the helicopter was on final approach to the hospital at
Bethany.
Records indicate the helicopter departed Bethany at 0607. Dispatch did not
receive a departure report from the pilot, but did receive a standard position
report at 0622. Dispatch personnel regarded the failure to receive a departure
report as "unusual, but not real remarkable," and attributed it to
distance and altitude. The 0622 position report indicated a heading of 195
degrees, 52 nautical miles (NM) to destination, 93 knots ground speed, and
an estimated time en route of 34 minutes.
According to Life Flight personnel, when the pilot failed to make his next
routine position report at 0637, Dispatch personnel initiated the preaccident
plan. Attempts to reestablish ground-air radio communication with the
helicopter were unsuccessful. Another Life Flight helicopter, airborne in the
vicinity, was unable to establish radio or visual contact with the accident
helicopter.
In accordance with company policy, when the pilot missed the second
consecutive position report at 0652, dispatch initiated a ground search. The
dispatcher stated this involved telephone calls to en route/area hospitals,
police and fire departments, other EMS aircraft, the FAA, etc. At 0656, when
the helicopter was overdue at the destination hospital, Life Flight personnel
initiated a full (air and ground) Law Enforcement search.

WRECKAGE / IMPACT INFORMATION
The helicopter impacted terrain in a field located three miles northwest of
Cameron, Missouri. It impacted the ground on a south-southwesterly heading, in
a field seeded with corn. A small wooded area was located on the north edge of
the cornfield, populated with trees approximately 60 feet tall. There was no
evidence of impact with trees. The initial impact mark was located about 70
feet south of the wooded area. Ground scars and debris were located along a
150 foot long, 80 foot wide path, which extended in a southerly direction from
the northernmost impact mark. Photographs and a wreckage diagram are appended
to this report.
The helicopter was removed from the field and transferred to a hangar at the
Cameron Airport for reconstruction and further examination. Flight control
continuity was established, and there was no evidence of preimpact airframe
anomaly. Damage to the engine precluded a field teardown, so the engine was
crated and shipped to Turbomeca Engine Corporation for disassembly. Engine
teardown revealed the labyrinth seal which is part of the second stage nozzle
guide vane had separated from the nozzle. The total time on the part was 2,482
hours, and the manufacturer's recommended time between overhaul (TBO) of 2,500
hours. Copies of the teardown report and subsequent metallurgical examination
factual report are appended to this report.
MEDICAL/PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Autopsy and toxicological examinations revealed no evidence of preimpact
anomaly. The autopsy (#93 ME 416) was conducted on May 28, 1993, by Dr. John
Overman, Chief Medical Examiner of the Jackson County Medical Examiner's
Office, 2301 Holmes Street, Kansas City, Missouri, 64108.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING PROBLEMS WITH CRACKS
IN TURBOMECA ENGINES
Turbomeca personnel described the proposed failure mode as follows: "Under
thermal low cycle fatigue a crack may initiate on the 2nd turbine nozzle guide
vane hub...After initiation the crack develops as the subsequent
distortion leads to rub between the inner diameter of the hub and the inner
turbine labyrinth lips."
Turbomeca representatives reported "There is no possibility to inspect
with enough assurance the presence of crack by endoscope but the deterioration
is indicated by noise at [coastdown]. If not detected by noise at
auto-rotation or by check of the free rotation of the gas generator...the
crack may develop up to complete opening. The rub between the nozzle hub and
the 2nd stage turbine rotor leads to the destruction of the hub and
deterioration of the downstream gas generator and free turbine
components."

PREVIOUS PROBLEMS WITH TURBOMECA ENGINES
According to Turbomeca records, there
were 7 known previous incidents/accidents due to engine failures of a similar
nature. The
manufacturer also reported numerous cracks discovered during repair/overhaul.
Manufacturer's representatives reported all known events have been related
to the TU 76 standard nozzle, which was installed on the accident helicopter.
Turbomeca indicated service history on the TU 76 revealed "...that the
front end of the hub was not enough damage tolerant to possible small
manufacturing deviations of the inner radius."
Turbomeca has two modified nozzles available, the TU 197 and TU 202.
Manufacturer's representatives stated "...The TU 197 design has the same
function of accepting radial movements of the hub through a flexible assembly
on the same basic principle as the TU 76...," but there are fewer sharp
corners and the front and rear rings were repositioned to contact the lower
faces of the nozzle. Diagrams are appended. The TU 202 modification retained
the TU 76 standard design, "...with enhanced precautions for the inner
radius manufacture and inspection and with a change of material (NC 20T to
INCO 718) in order to have higher resistance to fatigue." Diagrams and
statements are appended.

TURBOMECA- ISSUES SERVICE BULLETINS
As a result of these occurrences, Turbomeca issued two Service Letters, #1406
dated December 18, 1992, and #1526 dated April 13, 1993. These letters
suggested rub (crack) detection actions. Turbomeca Service Bulletin #292 72
0181 (mandatory) dated July 13, 1993, also addresses rub detection actions.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airworthiness Directive (AD) 93-23-09,
effective December 15, 1993, made rub detection actions mandatory. Turbomeca
also issued two Service Bulletins, #292 72 0150 (recommended) dated March 31,
1992, and #292 72 0153 (optional) dated January 25, 1993, addressing
modifications TU 197 and TU 202. Copies of these Service Letters/Bulletins/ADs
are appended.
The checklist used by Life Flight personnel for the Model AS350 Daily
Preflight/Postflight Airworthiness inspections contained the instruction: "Perform compulsory check of the noise at rundown - After the last flight
of the day or at least once a day in accordance with Service Letter 1406/91/ARL/1
2nd issue." Excerpts from the checklist are appended.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|